My Digital Security

Before taking this Digital Media Literacy course I’ll be honest I have not thought about the security of my personal information online. I mean I absolutely use passwords and two factor authentication but putting measures in place to protect my sensitive information was not on my mind. It is good to know that there are currently ad blockers, encryption, privacy settings, and other ways to help protect online users. If the user is actively updating their software and reads through the terms of service for third party sharing, the risk of security breaches is lowered.

The reason that I have not installed ad blockers on my system is because I do not want it to interfere with my ASU Online courses and the affiliated websites and software. Given this is the last week of class, I am just not willing to risk the ad blocker interfering with my online college software. Ad Blocker is something I will test out to prevent the advertisements that bog down the loading speeds and redirect. Another thing that I am interested in looking more into is DuckDuckGo. This browser extension allows for private browsing and had tracking blockers and encryption built in. I love the idea of being able to search more privately and securely, but ultimately every website has their own Terms of Service and has the potential to misuse or mishandle user personal data.

One of the biggest things that I do to protect myself and my personal information is I do not overshare online. Sometimes online users will post information that gives away locating details that can be dangerous in some cases. For example, live videos show your live location, and this can give a burglar an opportunity to break in to your home if that location is not home. Location sharing is something I refrain from, and I rarely go live unless I want to bring people around me. I just understand that when I go live that it is public information what I do, what I say, what is in the background, etc. These are examples of locating details that people accessing online activity can use to locate the user, but since it’s online the intent is not clear or known to the user.

A person’s image is important to their social interaction and sometimes over the course of the internet old websites and webpages accumulate over the years. I would like to do my part and work on removing outdated webpages and personal data of mine that is available currently online. I understand that I can take the time and submit these requests of removal myself or I can pay to have a company do it for me. Most likely I will do it myself and possibly contact an outside company like Norton to help with the process.

In conclusion, I plan on taking quite a few security measures of my personal information online. I plan on testing out DuckDuckGo and Ad Blocker after I conclude my current courses. This is so I can be certain that the software will not interfere with my online college experience. I will read websites Terms of Service, especially if I plan to share personal information on the website. Finally, I will not disclose locating details and will work to remove old webpages affiliated with myself.


My Concern with the Control of the Media

My main concern with the control of the media is although there are government laws and policies put in place to protect the user’s personal information, many big tech companies may ask the user to agree to terms removing or modifying these rights.  Some big tech companies also have the user agree to terms that allow that company and its business partners to share and use the users’ personal information for the business partners’ products and services. Facebook, for example, accepts payment from its business partners to promote their business partner’s ads and provide their business partners with its users personal and demographic information. Facebook also uses its user’s personal data to improve and promote Facebook products and services, so, my concern is why doesn’t Facebook offer an incentive to its users for the information they use to improve and promote Facebooks products and services? Facebook and other big tech companies that are like a monopoly realize their power and are confident they will not be brought down, and the media will continue to be controlled by them because so many people and businesses rely on their network, community, and marketplace.

Freedom of speech is another concern that I have because the “monopolized” companies like Facebook has the biggest social network and has the power to filter content and people. Another way to put it is they have the power to silence speech in the biggest online platform community. They also have the power to promote or share media in a way to control what information reaches the mass consumers. Big tech corporations have the power, but that power is given to them by the mass consumers whose content they control.

Another piece of control in the media are company paid ads. Using consumer personal information to promote third party companies should in my opinion be a program to opt into by the user, not pushed to every user automatically. When consumers are overwhelmed with ads online it also overwhelms bandwidth speeds and is subject to “click-bate” and redirection from the intended website. There are ad blockers, anti-tracking software, incognito browsers, and DuckDuckGo, but these are all measures that I feel should not be necessary as advertisements should not be so overbearing. Also, all these programs come with their own “terms of service/agreement” and are subject to change.

Overall, I believe that the control in the media is in the hands of monopolized companies such as Facebook and fueled by the consumers and business partners relying so much on its online network/community. When these companies interfere with freedom of speech or the user’s online experience is when I believe there is a problem. Also, the ads being pushed to users are based on online activity and may have some inaccuracies or have some privacy concerns when pushing ads to users. Especially if a user is showing their Facebook timeline to someone else and an ad with privacy concerns pops up it can have negative effects on that user. This is because the ad is then in direct correlation of the users activity online whether it be financial, medical, or just private information to that user.


Opinions and News Surrounding the Vaccine Mandates this Week

The White House: President Joe Biden (2021). Path out of the Pandemic: President Biden’s COVID-19 Action Plan. White House.

There have been many people, groups, and organizations speaking up on the effects of the COVID Vaccine and Mask Mandate given by President Joe Biden in January of this year.

“All told, these efforts—and countless other Administration initiatives and policies—have resulted in over 175 million fully vaccinated Americans. But there are still nearly 80 million Americans eligible to be vaccinated who have not yet gotten their first shot.

The President’s plan will reduce the number of unvaccinated Americans by using regulatory powers and other actions to substantially increase the number of Americans covered by vaccination requirements—these requirements will become dominant in the workplace. In addition, the plan will provide paid time off for vaccination for most workers in the country.” (J. Biden 2021)

There were quite a few articles relating to the Covid Vaccine Mandate this week. Top news articles:

CNN: More than 100 part-timers at Indiana University Health left jobless for refusing Covid-19 vaccine

After two weeks paid time off to receive the required COVID-19 vaccine, “125 part -time employees at Indiana University Health system, the largest physician network in the state” (C. Dominguez September 2021). Although the “IU Health’s website says the system has more than 34,000 staff members” (C. Dominguez 2021) there have been many companies firing employees and losing them for non-compliance of the Covid-19 vaccine.

CNN: More than 50 University of Georgia faculty members announce plans to mandate masks in their classrooms

This article points out the Covid Vaccine and Mask Mandate stances of the educators of the University of Georgia (UGA), University System of Georgia (USG), and Governor Brian Kemp. The educators of the UGA wrote a letter to staff and students requiring masks on campus and urging for the vaccine. The USG is recommending masks and vaccinations but does not require such measures to attend class. The UGA is pushing for the mask requirement take affect in October. Governor Brian Kemp “issued an executive order barring local governments from enforcing mask mandates regarding businesses, but local school districts have been allowed to decide whether tor require masks.” (R. Riess, G. Lemos 2021)

Washington Post: Oregon school worker suspended for showing up in blackface in apparent protest of vaccine mandate

“Oregon’s governor announced last month that all teachers, staff and volunteers in the state’s public schools must be fully vaccinated by October 18th” (R. Pannett 2021), and one elementary teacher decided to dress in blackface as Rosa Parks in an attempt to protest this vaccine mandate. This teacher was put on leave, and the school stated its stance against any form of racism.

Washington Post: Biden’s vaccine mandates are not enough. He must also mandate vaccines for travel.

This article was the opinion of Ezekiel J. Emanuel and John P. Moore. “Ezekiel J. Emanuel is vice provost at the University of Pennsylvania and a former member of Joe Biden’s public health advisory committee. John P. Moore is a professor of microbiology and immunology at Weill Cornell Medicine.” (2021). This article points out that the there is a “short window to boost coronavirus” before the holiday season; there is a need to protect people who cannot be safely be vaccinated against the remaining unvaccinated Americans; and that we should make traveling harder for “unvaccinated Americans” to help increase the vaccination rates.

The New York Times: A federal appeals court delays New York City’s vaccines mandate for teachers.

The mandate if passed will require all adults employed within the New York school system receive at least one dose of the Covid vaccine by Monday. The article points out that the Mayor Bill de Blasio is looking to enforce the vaccine mandate, the U.S. Court of Appeals granted the injunction in order for a panel to review the case, and that there should be a decision “in the next few days, possibly over the weekend, and anticipated that the mandate be upheld.” The unions against the mandate urge that they are not prepared to “deal with staffing crunches.”

The New York Times: What Students Are Saying About School Vaccine Mandates, Nostalgia and Beachside Bliss

The Learning Network provided a piece on what students think about the vaccine mandate in schools, what reminds them of their childhoods, and a “short story inspired by an image titled “In the Waves”. Some students feel that the vaccine mandates do not allow Americans to truly embrace freedom and freedom of choice, a lot of students believe that the vaccine mandate is fine because other vaccines are already mandated and if they are FDA approved. Most of the responses recorded from the students in this article agreed that the vaccine mandate should be upheld in some way. These opinions came from students in Loveland, CO, Hyattsville, MD, and Centerton, AR. The student’s childhood memories and short stories offered a good insight into the minds of these students.


Extra Credit: Generation Z; “SIFT” Through Information Before Sharing, Please

There can be some negative effects when a person shares false or misleading information on social media. A lot of times people share from a person or an organization that has been previously trusted with news or information without proper research. We can all agree that humans make mistakes and strive to place themselves in an accepting role in society or community while sharing information.

With that said if you compare the information shared to a pitcher of lemonade at a table surrounded by family and friends. If a person passes the pitcher of lemonade to someone at the table, but contaminates it by sneezing in it; whether the person who received the pitcher of lemonade after this person saw the contaminated sneeze or not, those germs will be shared with the rest of the table until someone speaks up about the contamination. Or in our case pointing out the false or misleading information that was shared on social media.

False and misleading information, like germs, have the potential to contaminate and overwhelm facts and can manipulate society. Social media is a platform with the capability of spreading information at “lightning speeds”, and like the “telephone game” false or misleading information has the potential to change the narrative completely. I highly recommend using a system called the “SIFT Method” (M. Caufield 2019).

The “SIFT Method” (M. Caufield 2019) consists of four steps and aims to guide the reader through researching and verifying information and sources. This method urges the reader to “Stop, Investigate the Source, Find Better Coverage, and Trace claims, quotes and media to the original context.” (M. Caufield 2019)

When I first come across an article I stop and research what I am reading until I find a scientific peer reviewed journal or primary source. This means that I try my hardest to find the “original source” of the information to gain a better understanding of the context and facts surrounding it.

The second thing I do is investigate the source(s) to decide of its credibility. Research people, places, quotes, and anything scientific or innovative. I tend to trust government websites and college institutions because I find the information shared to be credible and often, they provide links to the primary or original source of the information.

Of the news stations, I find the most credible news organization to be CNN, and often find myself comparing other news stories to CNN regardless of who shared the information first. This is an example of “finding better coverage”, because CNN requires less “digging” to find the primary source as they will provide the links, or direct quotes to the primary source.

Even though the credible sites or organizations provide links to the original source, the last step in the SIFT Method is to “trace claims, quotes and media to the original context” (M. Caufield 2019). Once the research has brought the reader to the original source or context of the information, the reader is able to make a sound and justified decision whether to share the information on social media. The information shared then has a higher potential of being factual instead of false or misleading regardless of the person who shares opinion of the information. I also recommend that the primary/original source be shared along with the shared post on social media.


M. Caulfield (June 19, 2019). “SIFT (The Four Moves)”. WordPress.


No Trolls In My Family

It is difficult to find only one way to help a friend or loved one understand the importance of not sharing false or misleading information on social media. We each have various levels of comfort and/or closeness with everyone in our lives; I suggest we establish different levels of communication to better inform how the information is false or misleading. I also find it important to respond to your friends or loved ones in a private form rather than for everyone else to see.

No matter how small the disagreement about the information is, when pointed out in a social forum for others to see the exchange immediately changes the environment to somewhat like “a stage” or “boxing match” given the topic. This situation then could make it a free for all to debate back and forth, exchanging misinformation and facts, as others view the exchange and create an opinion of it.

Communication is key and if done properly can change the way we all perceive and exchange information with each other including online. I urge people to research the facts of the false or misinformation down to a primary source along with the other components of the SIFT Method. A primary source is one that recalls a topic firsthand and within the timeframe of that topic. Make note of the primary source and how it proves the shared information is false or a misrepresentation and pass on the information in a proper communication channel to the friend or loved one.

I recommend communicating with family and friends is best done over the phone. Over the phone meaning vie text, messenger, or phone call. Anyone that falls outside that bracket should be contacted via email or social media messenger and you should never out people on a public forum firsthand. I do however recommend that good credible information be distributed as much as possible if initial communication does not work,

I believe it is important to post credible facts with a primary source to combat trolls already “flooding comments”. Trolls are posting comments for an audience. The audience being the people logged into the forum reading and posting in the comments. If credible information proving the falsehood or inaccuracies are being made more readily available privately to the people sharing the information that is being commented on; I believe this would diffuse the exchange of false and inaccurate information. Unless the owner of the forum is a troll. In that case I would deem the forum non-credible and move on.


Deeply Analyzing a News Article

The recent news article that I chose to “deeply analyze” was “Assessing the cost of the vaccine mandate, could be expensive for some Arizona businesses” by Mark Phillips of ABC15. The sources quoted or referenced in this article were President Biden, Arizona Chamber of Commerce Garrick Taylor, the Kaiser Family Foundation, Arizona Restaurant Association, and Governor Ducey. These sources are credible to this news article on Bidens vaccine mandate, and the effects it has on Arizona Businesses. Therefore, if the facts are accurate these sources absolutely increase the credibility of this article.

The article explains Garrick Taylor “is concerned President Biden’s vaccine mandate is a step too far.” (M. Phillips September 2021). According to the statement by Garrick Taylor “We all want this pandemic to end, to keep our health care systems from being overwhelmed, and to keep our economy open. This requires a partnership and collaboration between the private sector and all levels of government, not top-down mandates from Washington.” (G. Taylor September 2021). The article seems accurate on the stance by Garrick Taylor and the Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry after further research.

A concern pointed out in the article was the “cost of COVID-19 testing” (M. Phillips September 2021). Arizona is one of eleven states that are prohibiting the “COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates, as of September 8, 2021” (Kaiser Family Foundation September 2021). According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, “Arizona state and local governments are prohibited from requiring any person to be vaccinated for COVID-19…. [they] are also prohibited from establishing a vaccine passport” (Kaiser Family Foundation September 2021). President Biden’s vaccine mandate is also prohibited in schools when it comes to face mask requirement and vaccine mandate for school employees. Arizona offers “free cost vaccine when available” according to “state health policy actions during COVID-19 public health emergency” (Kaiser Family Foundation September 2021). Therefore, in Arizona the cost of the vaccine is hardly an issue as vaccine mandate is prohibited in Arizona and the vaccine is free when available. Arizona “state has prohibited proof of-vaccination requirements through executive order and legislation” according to the National Restaurant Association (September 2021). Some counties and cities recommend certain things like face coverings and social distancing, but they are not mandates.

Towards the end of the article, it lists the stance of President Biden and Governor Ducey. “The President wants 80-million more people vaccinated, whether they want the shot or not.” (M. Phillips September 2021). This statement is a little tricky because of the part “whether they want the shot or not” implies forced vaccinations. The statement from the White House is “The Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is developing a rule that will require all employers with 100 or more employees to ensure their workforce is fully vaccinated or require any workers who remain unvaccinated to produce a negative test result on at least a weekly basis before coming to work”. (The White House 2021). The White House also states that “this requirement will impact over 80 million workers in private sector businesses with 100+ employees” (The White House 2021). “Governor Ducey joined the chorus of republican lawmakers promising a legal challenge” (M. Phillips September 2021). Governor Doug Ducey issued an Executive Order that does just that. 

Overall, this article seems credible given the sources and the transparency in the statements within the article. The reporter gave accurate depictions of the vaccine mandate and the stances by the sources provided. If I had to grade this story I would give it an “A” because the information was transparent, accurate, and supported by credible sources. The cost of the vaccine mandate “could” be expensive for some Arizona businesses, but Governor Doug Ducey “Promises a legal challenge” and issued an executive order to follow through.


Mark Phillips (September 9 2021. “Assessing the cost of the vaccine mandate, could be expensive for some Arizona businesses”.

The White House. (n.d.). “Path Out of the Pandemic”.

Office of the Governor Doug Ducey. (August 16 2021). “Governor Ducey Takes Action to Further Protect Arizonans From Local Vaccine Mandates”.

Governor Doug Ducey (August 16 2021). “Executive Order 2021-18: Returning to our Principles of Governance”. State of Arizona Executive Order.

Garrick Taylor (September 10 2021). “Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry Statement on the New Vaccine Mandate”. Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

Kaiser Family Foundation (September 9 2021). “State COVID-19 Data and Policy Actions”.

National Restaurant Association (September 10 2021). “State and Local Mask Mandates and COVID-19 Related Requirements (Provided by ServSafe Compliance)”.



News versus Opinion

1. On any topic that you find interesting (and tend to follow closely) 

The role of Group IIA Secretory Phospholipase A2 (sPLA2-IIA) as a biomarker for COVID Mortality

2. Find four (4) items online about that topic. For each example, provide an explanation of why the coverage is news or opinion. You should also explain why the piece is credible or not. 

Two that are news items

“UArizona study found enzyme in COVID deaths similar to rattlesnake venom” (September 1 2021). Briana Whitney. AZFamily.

This article referenced above would be classified as a news item in my opinion. The article explains that the study done by “A University of Arizona research team” (B. Whitney 2021) states in the opening line that this is not a cure, rather the correlation between the enzyme and COVID-19 may help prevent death from COVID-19. The article informs the reader that “this enzyme actually fights off infection, but the enzyme was doing a 180 in severely ill people and attacking the body instead.” (B. Whitney 2021) The intentions for what to do with this correlation was clearly stated “the goal would be to have inhibitors as a therapeutic target to reduce mortality and patients suffering from COVID-19 symptoms for months and months.” (B. Whitney 2021) This article is credible because it was informative, but did not include opinion or biases.

“Like Venom Coursing Through the Body: Researchers Identify Mechanism Driving COVID-19 Mortality” (August 24 2021). College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. University of Arizona News.

In my opinion this article referenced above would be classified as a news item as well. The scientific correlation was studied by researchers from the University of Arizona and this article was published on the University of Arizona’s News page. The article listed the other collaborators in this research as Stony Brook University and Wake Forest School of Medicine. The article provided the name of the enzyme as “secreted phospholipase A2 Group IIA, or sPLA2-IIA” (R. Brandt 2021). The article clarifies that the enzyme is similar to that of rattlesnake venom, is found in healthy individuals, and has been know to fight off bacterial infections and destroying microbial cell membranes. (R. Brandt 2021). This article informed the reader that only at high circulating levels of this enzyme is when it is in danger of “contributing to organ failure and death” (R. Brandt 2021). This article focused on facts and did not include opinions or predictions. I believe this article is credible because the referenced a link to the actual study that was conducted.

Two that are opinion or analysis. 

“Study find link between COVID-19 deaths and snake venom” (September 2 2021). KNXV Staff. News Channel 5 Nashville.

The first thing about this article that I noticed was the title. There was no scientific findings that suggest that “snake venom is linked to COVID-19 deaths” (KNXV 2021). The article also suggests that “snakes are starting to play a big role in COVID-19 research” (KNXV 2021). I feel these two opening statements are misleading as it is actually an enzyme that even healthy individuals have in small doses to fight off bacterial infections. The enzyme sPLA2-IIA is in correlation with COVID, not actual snake venom. The article does have quotes from Chilton who is a researcher in the study with University of Arizona that briefly clarifies the correlation, but the article ends with “Bryan Hughes, a Rattlesnake expert” and he said, “it seems fitting and interesting and ironic that the venom that they have in rattlesnakes might be the key in getting out of this situation” (KNXV 2021). I feel like this article is less credible because it contained misleading information and because of the quote from “Bryan Hughes” to end the article was confirmation of the bias and misleading information.

“The link between COVID-19, rattlesnake venom and a killer enzyme inspires treatment target” (August 24 2021). Ariene Weintraub. Fierce Biotech.

​Again, I found this article to have a misleading title, “The link between COVID-19, rattlesnake venom and a killer enzyme inspires treatment target” (A. Weintraub 2021). This title labels the enzyme as a “killer enzyme”, but the enzyme is found in healthy individuals at low levels and actual works to fight of bacterial infections. The article did go on to explain this and quote “Chilton” as the other articles did, but left the article on a question “if the enzyme is still relatively high and active, could it be responsible for part of the long COVID outcomes that we’re seeing?” (A. Weintraub 2021). I feel that this question steps over the fact that individuals with COVID and high levels of this enzyme are at risk of death, the focus is not necessarily the many people living with COVID-19 for months and months. I feel like this article is less credible because it leaves the reader with unanswered questions and the title instills a sense of fear using terms as “COVID-19, Rattlesnake venom, and a killer enzyme”.


My Media Use: 24-Hour Window

Note: This blog is intended to satisfy assignment criteria in my Digital Media Literacy I course at Arizona State University. I was asked to provide a detailed record of how I use media in a “24-hour stretch”.

*Recorded on August 26th, 2021

9:00 a.m.: Wake up and check my phone. The apps that I use when I wake up are the clock to check time, messages to see if family or clients sent messages while I slept, Canvas to check on my two courses this Fall B semester, and Instagram for motivation/networking. The news that I received this morning came from Instagram. I mostly follow entrepreneur/wealth, psychology, and music entertainment. The only current event relevant that I gained besides motivation was the cringe worthy “crate challenge”. At this point I am just waiting for this challenge to disappear from the media.

11:30 a.m.: After breakfast I begin to prioritize my day. I set up my laptop in the quietest room in the house, the living room, and since the remote is missing I refrain from turning it on. I pull up Canvas and open my phone to use DUO Push Authentication. I check my messages and respond to a text with a client before going back to Canvas. I check my “Aging and the Life Course” class, which requires Yellowdig (threaded conversation that is graded). So, I post a comment to a classmate’s introduction and react to a few posts.

I then switch to Digital Media Literacy and open “My Media Use: a 24-hour look” by Dan Gillmor as a reference to this assignment. I open Word and start creating the content about my personal 24-hour media use to then switch over to my Blog for publishing. I know that I still have quite a few articles for this weeks Module 2; a conversation post and a quiz. My priority is to complete my learning materials for this week, and then I will be able to complete the rest of my assignments for Digital Media Literacy I.

12:30 p.m.: Digital Media Literacy I, Module 2: Learning Materials. I start with the first video about “Media History” (Gillmor, n.d.). Professor Gillmor describes the history of media as Cave/Wall drawings, to papyrus scrolls, and then to the Bible (“done by hand by people called scribes”) (Gillmor, n.d.). In a way spreading the word of the bible began a spark of media throughout the world. After the printing press was invented, then people started using media for “political and social purposes, beyond spreading the word of the bible” (Gillmor, n.d.). The invention of the telegraph helped speed up the transmission of media to the speed of light. In this video, Professor Gillmor said journals helped mass media, radio broadcasting started mass media, and television helped engrave memories. (Gillmor, n.d.). From the “Legacy Model” to the “21st Century Information Flow” the message I received from this video is that “consumers have become creators and creators become collaborators” (Gillmor, n.d.) I enjoy history so this video was fun for me to watch.

1:00 p.m-6:00 p.m.: Instagram for Lunch and More Learning Materials after. During lunch I opened Instagram and learned from @hot975vegas that “there was a suicide bombing in Kabul outside Afghanistan’s airport with some casualties being American.” I also learned from a few posts that it is “National Dog Day”. Up to this point I haven’t really engaged in or sought out any news sources to verify validity of these stories, I repost a few motivation memes to Instagram, and my focus today is mostly on schoolwork.

I read the material underneath “Learning Materials for Module 2” in my Digital Media Literacy I course so I will be prepared to complete my outstanding conversation post and be prepared for the quiz Sunday. Some of the sources of these articles were,, NY Times, Columbia Journalism Review, Washington Post, Neiman Reports, Pew Research Center, Virginian-Pilot, ASU News CO/Lab, and a blog written by a friend of Professor Dan Gillmor, Ethan Zuckerman.

I also watched two videos the remaining two videos by Professor Dan Gillmor about “A Messy Media Ecosystem” and “Principles”.

7:00 p.m.: After Dinner, Movie. My family watches a movie after dinner before we get ready for bed. We decided to watch “The Avengers: End Game” on “DisneyPlus”. Typically, I charge my phone during a movie, but other times I will surf Instagram or Facebook. I keep in touch with family members on Facebook and network on Instagram. Tonight, my phone is charging until morning, and the Avengers: End Game is over three hours; so, Goodnight.

How I Rate My Media Sources

(Range of 1-10. 1=Least Credible, 10=Most Credible

I would rate the media I used in this exercise as mostly credible. This includes the videos and articles referenced under Learning Materials For Module 2 in Digital Media Literacy I. All of these sources would get a “10” rating from me because of the high credibility of Arizona State University and Professor Dan Gillmor.

Facebook and Instagram would receive a rate of “5” for credibility. Social media platforms are not credible in my opinion. They are a platform with posts based on feelings and opinions; not necessarily facts. I do respect that most news stations are adapting to an online social presence, and during the Pandemic and Quarantine I did follow CNN, and local news stations on Social Media to keep informed,

Videos (In order of watching them)

Gillmor, D. (n.d.). “A Brief History of Media”. ASU News Co/Lab.

Gillmor, D. (n.d.). “A Messy Media Ecosystem”. ASU News Co/Lab.

Gillmor, D. (n.d.). “Principles”. ASU News Co/Lab.

Links (Articles are in order of reading them)